頁:
[1]
美國海軍在激光武器上的進展
本帖最後由 MightyDragon 於 2013-4-1 09:03 PM 編輯整個報告太長了。基於在經驗上大多數網友都不愛看外文(還是根本不懂)，我就隨便將大綱部份貼出來就算數。單單是大綱部份已經可以看到：中國又是躺著都中箭的角色 {:46:} 中國的ASBM完全是美國海軍的心腹大患、欲除之而後快。在激光來源上幾乎是SSL和FEL之爭：SSL比較成熟而FEL則看來更有「潛力」。當然躺著中箭的中國亦不是一般的角色，雖比較低調但這方面的發展亦絕不會落後於美國之下…
Source: CRS Report for Congress "Navy Shipboard Lasers for Surface, Air, and Missile Defense: Background and Issues for Congress"
Department of Defense (DOD) development work on high-energy military lasers, which has been underway for decades, has reached the point where lasers capable of countering certain surface and air targets at ranges of about a mile could be made ready for installation on Navy surface ships over the next few years. More powerful shipboard lasers, which could become ready for installation in subsequent years, could provide Navy surface ships with an ability to counter a wider range of surface and air targets at ranges of up to about 10 miles. These more powerful lasers might, among other things, provide Navy surface ships with a terminal-defense capability against certain ballistic missiles, including China’s new anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM).
The Navy and DOD have conducted development work on three principal types of lasers for potential use on Navy surface ships—fiber solid state lasers (SSLs), slab SSLs, and free electron lasers (FELs). One fiber SSL prototype demonstrator developed by the Navy was the Laser Weapon System (LaWS); another Navy fiber SSL effort is called the Tactical Laser System (TLS). Among DOD’s multiple efforts to develop slab SSLs for military use was the Maritime Laser Demonstration (MLD), a prototype laser weapon developed as a rapid demonstration project. The Navy has developed a lower-power FEL prototype and is now developing a prototype with scaled-up power. These lasers differ in terms of their relative merits as potential shipboard weapons.
Although the Navy is developing laser technologies and prototypes of potential shipboard lasers, and has a generalized vision for shipboard lasers, the Navy currently does not have a program of record for procuring a production version of a shipboard laser, or a roadmap that calls for installing lasers on specific surface ships by specific dates. The possibility of equipping Navy surface ships with lasers in coming years raises a number of potential issues for Congress, including the following: • whether the Navy should act now to adopt a program of record for procuring a production version of a shipboard laser, and/or a roadmap that calls for installing lasers on specific surface ships by specific dates; • how many types of lasers to continue developing, particularly given constraints on Navy funding, and the relative merits of types currently being developed; and • the potential implications of shipboard lasers for the design and acquisition of Navy ships, including the Flight III DDG-51 destroyer that the Navy wants to begin procuring in FY2016.
In addition to decisions on whether or not to fund continued development of potential shipboard lasers, options for Congress regarding potential shipboard lasers include, among other things, encouraging or directing the Navy or some other DOD organization to perform an analysis of alternatives (AOA) comparing the cost-effectiveness of lasers and traditional kinetic weapons (such as missiles and guns) for countering surface, air, and missile targets, and encouraging or directing the Navy to adopt a program of record for procuring a production version of a shipboard laser, and/or a roadmap that calls for installing lasers on specific surface ships by specific dates. ...<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容，請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div><div></div> 怎麼看都是老美想引發第二次冷戰，指是老中這次沒像老俄之前那樣血氣方剛直接拚下去，對於老美的"潑髒水"不為所動，自己玩自己的XDDDDD
真複雜..還是有點看不懂甚麼是激光武器耶..美國的武器越做越先進了.. 老實說
沒有足夠的電力
這種武器的殺傷力很難破壞
難道未來戰艦都需要用核能的嗎 美國真的老是擁有很多超越其他國家很多代數的技術，有時候真的很懷疑他們這些科技技術是從哪裡得來的???<br><br><br><br><br><div></div> .............................................我寧願用飛彈打.............................
美國真是害人不淺........一直誘使敵人作浪費投資 老美是在第二次冷戰八
只是以前是蘇俄 現在變成中國
美國也不是啥好東西 利益而已 中國還真愛學美國阿~
哪天美國消失 中國會不會 不知道要發展什麼{:36:} 我常常在想，激光武器確有許多優點，一些技術上的缺點也可以隨著技術的進步被克服，但是遇到大霧或者大雨天氣怎麼辦？ 最重要的還是電能 這武器目前最多能放在核子航母上 近海防衛 不然一般戰艦 打2發 船可能就動不了<br><br><br><br><br><div></div>
頁:
[1]